Barriers To Vietnamese Seafood Exports †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: What is the impact of the non-tariff barrier on price of the export of the Vietnamese seafood in the long run and short run? How the US non-tariff barriers are applied to the Vietnamese seafood? Answer: Introduction Vietnamese seafood divided into the two genera, Pangasianodon and Pangasius. These are the general name given to the Vietnamese seafood especially fish. The cultural seafood is the seafood and is famous for Vietnam export and aquaculture. Below figure 1 shows the production and the culture area of the Vietnamese seafood from year 1997 to 2011 where in the figure the blue line shows the production of the Vietnamese seafood and the culture area is demonstrated by the column in the figure. (Anders, 2008) It demonstrates that the Vietnamese seafood culture area is fluctuated from 1000 hectares more to 3000 hectare from year 1997 to 2005 and then it reduces to 2000 hectare in year 2006 and there is sudden rise from year 2007 to year 2009 and then decreasing continuously in year 2010 and year 2011. The culture area increase major reason was for steady increase of production of seafood from year 1997 to year 2005. Thus, the sudden rise in the seafood to surplus is the seafood supply. (Chau, 2007) The seafood creation likewise expanded altogether from 400 thousand tones to 650 thousand tones in the vicinity of 2006 and 2007. The area of the culture did not increment, notwithstanding, the seafood creation had the abrupt expanded from 650 thousand tons to 1,100 thousand tons in the vicinity of 2007 and 2008. The world monetary emergency made a few issues for Vietnamese seafood send out, and the seafood business. Thus of monetary emergency, there was the fast lessening in the seafood creation in 2009. In 2010, the world monetary appeared to the recuperation; accordingly of developing interest the seafood generation expanded once more. In 2011, add up to seafood generation in Vietnam achieved almost 1,300 thousand tones. (Anh, 2009) Figure 1: The production of seafood in Vietnam from year 1997 to 2011 Background For exporting the seafood, Vietnam started it in from 1995s. With a specific end goal to fulfill the prerequisites of the EU (European Union) and US customers change in quality of seafood meat, security sustenance necessities were gotten more consideration. To fulfill these norms, Vietnamese procedures of the seafood to receive new their innovation to enhance the conventions that are used for quality control of HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) and GLOBAL GAP (Good Aquaculture Practice) suggested by US Drug and Food Administration and the Organization of Agriculture and Food in handling (Cohen, 2001) The seafood was sent out to the US expanded abruptly from under 280 tons in 1998 to 7,700 tons in year 2001 (Sengupta 2003) and achieved 108,000 tons in 2011. It worth 331.6 million USD in 2011, expanded to 87.8% contrasted and in 2010 (VASEP, 2011). In 2011, the EU and US were as yet the two greatest fare markets of Vietnamese seafood with the piece of the overall industry 18% and 29.7%, individually. Be that as it may, the development of Vietnamese seafood import effectually affected the US seafood household industry since Vietnamese seafood has the comparatively in taste yet the cost is less expensive (Duc, 2010). Consequently, the protectionists for US local ventures of seafood generation nations kept an eye on development in the current years (Thinh, 2011). Figure 2: The production of Vietnam seafood and US seafood from year 1997 to 2011 Problem statement In this manner, the difficulties confronting Vietnamese seafood fares is that there are numerous non-tariff barriers from greatest markets, for example, the EU and the US markets. Preeminent among of them were the antidumping and the labeling law that U.S forced on Vietnamese seafood. The motivations behind these barriers expanded to household generation of U.S seafood and lessening the fare volume of Vietnamese seafood to U.S, at the same time. Be that as, after "seafood war", Vietnamese seafood could grow the exchange stream to more different markets outside U.S and truth be told, the impacts on cost of the labeling law on U.S seafood in residential market was very negative, not positive as desire of U.S seafood processors (Duc, 2010). There are some of the technical barriers that the Vietnam industry has to face. Vietnamese seafood is a standout among the most imperative items to fare of Vietnam fisheries firm. As specified over, the fare volume of Vietnamese seafood on the planet showcase increment relentlessly step by step. in the current years, the fare estimation of the Vietnamese seafood expanded however the pay of refined seafood agriculturists was still low. The motive is the insecure of seafood costs. The Vietnamese agriculturists couldn't choose the cost for their items and they need to generally rely on upon the seafood processors or endeavors. In the mean time, the non-tariff barriers through more challenges for Vietnamese seafood exporters and the processors. (Alan, 2005) Objective of research The purpose of this study is for evaluating the effects of the NTBs under policies of the US restriction on Vietnam seafood prices from year 1999s to 2011s.For employing the objective of the research, there are some set of hypothesize of NTBs that are importing the countries that are having negative impact on the industry of Vietnamese seafood. The econometric model is used for testing the research hypothesis. Literature review Walter in year 2011, discussed as per the ramifications of non-tariff barriers, how were the NTBs connected to imports by modern nations and the possibilities of creating nations export execution. The NTBs characterized as all approaches of the administration and practices to limit the volume, heading or creation organization of the global exchange. NTBs were isolated into three primarily gatherings. The primary gathering incorporated the NTBs were utilized as instrument of the business arrangements, for example, portions, sponsorships to import-contenders. The second portrayed the NTBs assumed the part as exchange prohibitive purposes, e.g. bundling and stamping prerequisites, clean controls, traditions valuation and characterization practices. The last gathering has a place with the NTBs non-exchange strategy destinations, e.g. certain sorts of utilization charges and government imposing business models. As per Sam (2006), NTBs inventions had built the database for major market of the developed economy and around 80 of the developing countries in starting 1980s with the help of UNCTAD. Be that as, the constraints stayed in the Database on the grounds that the signs in there have same for all nations and it didn't have any file to quantify the effect of NTBs if any adjustments in the power of utilization happened. Baldwin (2009) indicated the different techniques to quantify the NTBs and the exchange twisting impacts of NTBs. Same as Walter, likewise isolated NTBs into the three imperative gatherings. The first gathering was additionally the devices to confine or restrict the fare or import the volume, e.g. the shares. The second gathering represented the supporting arrangements of the government, e.g. endowments, coordinate budgetary collaborator, and so forth. The last gathering, however not at any rate, spoke to the foundation of guidelines or controls that relating labeling, packaging, food safety, health, and so on. Beaulieu (2005) talked about the antidumping obligations issue for bringing in shrimp to US from 2000 to 2002. This is the case similar to the Vietnamese seafood case. The negative impacts on US seafood residential industry that import the Vietnamese seafood to US are reasons for the antidumping forcing on the Vietnamese seafood. Thus, Beaulieu prescribed that despite the fact that antidumping was as yet the best obstructions for seafood exchange yet it ought to get better if the application for hypothesis of aggressive advantaged and advancement with the expectation of complimentary exchange as opposed to forcing the antidumping for the creating nations on the grounds that the sparing of the securing costs. An examination advertises prior and then afterward "seafood war" was analyzed by Binh (2006). By the essential information and expressive measurement strategy, displayed the circumstance of creation, utilization and the exchange approach of Vietnamese seafood previously, then after the fact "seafood war". The most critical modifications in Vietnamese seafood generation were the exchange from the nature to simulate in fingerling for building the nature of fingerling for appropriation the specialized models of the US market. The extension in size of seafood creation additionally rolled out the improvements from the self made to the modern nourishes. Kinnucan's review in 2003 connected the model of equilibrium on displacement to look at the impacts of the targeted tariff (tariff that forced on the undertakings of a unique nation) on US seafood industry. Kinncan's investigation for the most part centered on solidified seafood filets and most imperative supposition was the US as a "substantial country" shipper in the exchange connection among US and Vietnam. In this manner, the adjustments in US import request impact to Vietnamese seafood cost. The outcomes demonstrated that tariff, when all is said in done, was incapable in light of the fact that two of the reasons: firstly, the nearly supply source of seafood was homogenous, in this manner, a tariff forced on one source ought to be a verifiable for other source, that implied the ensure motivations behind tariff duty were difficult to noteworthy. Secondly, the import request flexibility for seafood was influencing and expansive for importing supply versatility. Research Hypothesis As per above theory, the framework was constructed for estimating the impact of the NTBs that are imposed on Vietnam seafood. Below is some of the hypothesis that is used in the research: Non-tariff barriers were executed in the market of US only and not in markets of ROW. Assumed one price for the law. Thus, Vietnamese seafood export prices will remain constant to various countries that are importing. There is a hold of 95% Vietnam in the total import for seafood demand of US and import from other supply sources for the seafood was unimportant. (Carter, 2007) Large market is assumed to be in US and thus any modifications in US demand can impact the price and quantity of the Vietnamese seafood. Vietnam import seafood in negligible and can get ignored. Therefore, total supply of the seafood in the Vietnam is the total domestic demand in Vietnamese and total seafood will get exported to ROW and US. There are various forms of the Vietnamese seafood. Methodology Modeling identification Side of demand: Demand side evaluating the effect having factors on Vietnam seafood imported to market of world. The assumptions, import the seafood that depend on client price and few other factors that shift the demand curves. (Duc, 2010)Below is the model for the import seafood: Ius = I (Pus, Zus) Irow = I (Prow, Zrow) Where: Ius is seafood import quantity in U.S Irow is seafood import quantity in ROW Zi and Pi (i = US, ROW) are consumer price and demand shifters of frozen seafood fillets in ROW and U.S. If, E as exchange change rate currency from VND and USD Then, Pi = E x PV Pus = Pv + T (Duc, 2010) Thus, the total import seafood is: M = Ius + Irow = I (Pus, Zus) + I (Prow, Zrow) = f (E, T, Pus, Prow, Zus, Zrow) Side of supply: Xv = f (Pv, Zv) Where: Xv is the seafood for Vietnamese export quantity Pv is FOB price of Vietnamese seafood Zv is export shifters supply of Vietnamese seafood. The equilibrium of market when whole export for the frozen seafood fillets that is equal to whole import for the frozen seafood fillets. (Edward, 2004) Assume, X = M Pv = f (E , T, Pus, Prow, Zus , Zrow, Zv) This is the model of reduced form if Vietnamese seafoods export price The above function shows the general elements impact to Vietnamese seafood in logarithm frame factors. In the model, other than shifters of supply and demand, the Vietnamese seafood cost rely on upon the swapping scale among VND and USD and the tariff forced on Vietnamese seafood by US. This tariff is an instrument of the US antidumping procedure, hence, in spite of the fact that this variable presents in the model with name of 'antidumping tax", however, it is, indeed, a barrier with non-tariff. (Marc, 2005) The impact of the antidumping and labeling law in time period from year 1997 to 2005 on seafood price that were tested with the help of Duc in year 2010 and it additionally a vital specialized hindrance for Vietnamese seafood industry. To fulfill with the nourishment security measures, the HACCP and GLOBAL GAP gauges were connected in the delivering procedure of Vietnamese seafood industry. We examine the effects of application the HACCP and GLOBAL GAP standard in delivering on the cost of Vietnamese seafood. The exploration of Linda (2008) with the instance of US apple that are imported to the Japan presumed that specialized obstruction is reasons for the abatement around 26% in the cost of Fuji apple on planet exchange. In any case, in inverse way, Ander (2008) contended that over the long haul, the fare nations can change their creating procedure to upgrade the necessity from bringing in nations. In the paper, we accepted that in spite of the fact that HACCP are apparatuses of spe cialized obstructions of US to limit the transported in volume of the Vietnamese seafood in their nation. Notwithstanding, over the long haul, the item is created under HACCP gauges can get sold at the cost that is higher than the items are delivered under the customary procedure since they make more trustworthy to shoppers as per the traceability of the items that they are utilizing. (Hanh, 2009) Thus, the revised model with reduced form Data collection The time series with secondary monthly data collected from years 1990s and 2011s utilized in this research analysis. The data as per the Vietnamese seafood exporting, producing and aquaculture will be obtained from General Statistics of Vietnam. The export price of the Vietnamese seafood obtained from VASEP and Vietnam Customs. The US income per capita and the fuel price are gathered from IMF statistics. The price of the seafood in China will get gathered from World Bank data. The price of the US seafood, the salmon and poultry price and the seafood US production obtained from the USDA. The data about barriers of non tariff will get gathered from WTO, FAO. (Hoai, 2009) Analysis of data The NTBs impact on Vietnamese frozen seafood fillets that are evaluating with the help of the models that are econometric. In the decreased frame demonstrate, the relationship of the Vietnamese solidified seafood filets and the autonomous factors is exhibited as a direct capacity. It has OLS (Ordinary least square) frame in an econometric with reliant factors is Vietnamese solidified seafood filet send out value Pv. The OLS model normal form: . The model is developed under the presumption of regularly disseminated factors. The variable has typically dispersion if its normal esteem is its mean and every perception is equivalent to its mean in addition to a "background noise" blunder term. (Hogendorn, 2006) The information fulfilled this condition additionally called as the stationary information (Duc, 2008). The OLS with the non-stationary information perhaps prompts the problematic estimation in light of the fact that the autocorrelation in the leftover. The aftereffects of autocorrelation are spurious OLS relapse with the wasteful coefficient evaluates one-sided and disparaged fluctuations, expanded t-insights, and a swelled in R-square (Carter, 2007). There are numerous alternatives to revise the non-stationary factors, for example, the scientifically changing factors with logarithms, types, contrasts, reverse and slack. Duc (2008) demonstrated that "if the factors in model are contrast stationary, a distinction show and slacked change model can be evaluated, and under a few conditions a mistake adjustment display ECM can be assessed". Right off the bat, the stationary the factors are tried at the level shape by the level frame. On the off chance that the factors at the level shape are stationary, the OLS model is appropriate for estimation of the model. Something else, the factors require the progressions to frame of logarithm for testing the stationary in light of the fact that the factors are non-stationary in level shape yet perhaps not in logarithm frame. (Hong, 2009) For this situation, a distinction show or slacked change display or the mistake rectification models (ECMs) with containing the leftover of the spurious OLS demonstrate in a distinction frame model are better answers for maintain a strategic distance from the non-stationary factors. We will introduce for these models in the take after. (Giap, 2010) Analysis and Result Below table shows the econometric model with estimations, now illustrate description of the information for all the variables that are continuous in the model that are reduced form in below: Description of data For checking the stationary of factors, we utilize the test result for the unit root by Eviews programming 6.0. The outcome demonstrates that, test esteem all factors that are non-stationary (the critical level of test-measurement esteem more noteworthy than 10%), aside from the Vietnamese seafood send out cost. We, in this manner, change the factors to frame of the logarithm and test stationary at level. The test for the Unit root shows the comparative outcome. The factors are not stationary for the zero requests. These outcomes roll out us improvement the factors to the frame that is logarithm first-differenced based. The consequences of the test for unit root demonstrate that all factors are stationary in logarithm with first-differenced frame. (Grant, 2008) NTBs effect on export price for Vietnamese seafood in short run In this section, we have exhibited our models that are econometric outcomes to assess the impacts of the NTBs that were forced by US on Vietnamese seafood trade cost in the short run and long run. In this manner, the utilization of the slacked change model is a bit much. Be that as it may, we likewise display the LTM evaluated brings about as per below table. (Intrafish, 2003) Conclusion This research purpose is for evaluating the NTBs impact that is imposed by the US on price of the export of Vietnamese seafood with the help of the theoretical framework for the equilibrium of supply and demand. The monthly information, which is based on the time-series from year 1999 to 2011, which are utilized for the aim that is empirical. Other than the NTBs, few other macroeconomic markers were additionally added into evaluated models to distinguish their effect on the Vietnamese seafood send out cost. (Jone, 2001) Vietnamese solidified seafood filets frame was picked because of its predominant offer in the fares. The worldwide market of Vietnamese seafood is totaled to two markets: the ROW and US. In macroeconomics were included into the models, the US seafood cost has positive impacts on the Vietnamese solidified seafood filets both in long and short run. (Jaffee, 2004) It implies that the Vietnamese seafood could play as the option for US seafood. The WTO joining and the cost of salmon likewise show beneficial outcomes on the Vietnamese seafood cost over the long haul. The swapping scale has negative impact on Vietnamese seafood send out cost. The point of NTBs is to confine the foreign made volume and ensure the household business. The lower interest for the transported in merchandise accordingly of NTBs causes negative consequences for the cost of imported items. This research tried the instance of NTBs on the planet import of Vietnamese seafood. (Kathy, 2012) The evaluated comes about proposed the antidumping of US have some of negative consequences for the fare cost of Vietnamese seafood over the long haul. The evaluated comes about showed that the use of GAP GLOBAL has the positive impact to expand the Vietnamese seafood send out cost over the long haul and it is not anticipated. We contended that the utilization of the standard may enhance the conviction of shopper for Vietnamese seafood items. (Khoi, 2009) The negative impact of swapping scale on the Vietnamese seafood send out cost is likewise a critical proposal to the Vietnam State directors in basic leadership procedure of the fund arrangements to maintain a strategic distance from the harm to Vietnamese seafood industry. (Kinnucan, 2002) The restriction of paper was that impacts of the NTBs are less huge on Vietnamese seafood cost for the time being. The reason might be rely on upon the information and the evaluated models shape. The assessed aftereffects of the models of econometric show that the short run, the NTBs (counting specialized boundaries) are not noteworthy on the progressions of fare cost of Vietnamese seafood. In any case, the NTBs, in the general, demonstrate a negative impact on the fare cost of Vietnamese seafood over the long haul. (Kouka, 2008) References Anders,S.M and Caswell,J.A, 2008. Standards as Barriers versus Standards as Catalyst: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Import, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, pp.1-12 Anh,N.T.V, 2009. Effects of food safety regulatory standards on seafood exports to US, EU and Japan, Master Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University Alan V. Deardorff, Robert M. S., 2005, Measurement of non-tariff barriers. Economics department, Working papers No. 179 OCDE/GD(97)129 Baier, S.L., Bergstrand.J, 2007, Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members. Journal of International Economics, 71 (1), pp. 72-95. Baldwin,E.R, 2009, Measuring nontariff trade policies. Working Paper No. 2978, National Bureau of economic research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 Binh,T.V, 2006, Before and after seafood War: Market Analysis. CAS Discussion paper N0 50, Centre for International Management and Development Antwerp Chau T. D., 2007, Current State of farming, process and export of Vietnamese seafood, Available from URL: https://chauthidaaquaculturedepartment.blogspot.com/2009/08/thuctrang-nuoi-trong-che-bien-xuat.html Carter,R.H., 2007, Principles of econometrics. Chapter 9: Dynamic Models, Autocorrelations and Forecasting, ISBN 978-0471-723608, Pp.226-267 Cohen.M and Hiebert.M, 2001, Muddying the Water, Far Eastern Economic Review November, pp. 29: 6769 DFID report, 2008, Fishery and International Trade, The UK Department for International Development (DFID) and Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) Ltd, Policy Brief 7 42 Duc,N.M, 2010, Application of econometric models for price impact assessment of antidumping measures and labelling laws on global markets: a case study of Vietnamese striped seafood, Reviews in Aquaculture 2, pp. 86101 Kinnucan,H, 2007, Effects of Antidumping Duties with Bertrand Competition: Some Evidence for Frozen seafood Fillets, Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, July 29- August 1, 2007 Duc et al, 2008, Econometric Lecture, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam Edward,S.G, 2004, The Exchange Rate and U. S. Agriculture, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 1-13 Marc,L.B, 2005, The political economy of nontariff barriers: a crossnational analysis. International Organization 49,4, pp. 723-49 Hanh, B.L.T, 2009, Impact of Financial variables on the production efficiency of Pangasius farms in An Giang province, Vietnam, Master Thesis in Fisheries and Aquaculture Management and Economics, The Norwegian College of Fishery Science University of Tromso, Norway Nha Trang University, Vietnam Hoai, T.N et al, 2009, Forecast and Data analysis in Economic and Finance, Published of Statistic, Chapter 8, Forecast models of Box-Jenkins method. Pp.451-498 Hogendorn,J.S., 2006, Economic Development, Third Edition, Harper Collins College Publishers. Hong,T.T.K, Duc,N.M, 2009, Competition Between Us Seafood And Imported Fish: A Demand System Analysis, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, Nong Lam University, Vietnam, (4):1110118 Giap,N.V and Jolly,M.C, 2010, Seafood Import Demand in the Caribbean Region, Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL Grant,H.J., Lambert,M.D 2008, Do regional trade agreements increase members agricultural trade, American Journal Agricultural Economic pp: 765782 Intrafish, 2003, Vietnamese Seafood Slapped With Harsh US Antidumping Duties, Available from URL: https://www.intrafish.com/article.php?article ID=35534 Jone,C.B., Bereau,J.C, 2001, Measurement of sanitary, phytosanitary and technical barriersto trade, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), A consultants report prepared for the Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Directorate. Jaffee, S., S. J. Henson, 2004, Food Exports from Developing Countries: The Challenges Posed by Standards, in Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries, Edited by M. A. Aksoy and J. C. Beghin. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Kathy,B., 2012, Something Fishy in Seafood Trade?, The relationship between Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers, Selected works Khoi, L.N.D. 2009, Quality Standards for Fish Supply Chains the Case of Organic Pangasius in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam, CAS Discussion Paper No. 67. Antwerp, Belgium: University of Antwerp. Kinnucan,W.H, 2005, Futility of Targeted Fish Tariffs and an Alternative. Marine Resource Economics , Volume 18, pp. 211224 Kinnucan,W.H, ystein M., 2002, The Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: a Mid-term Assessment, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 53, pp.195-219 Kouka,J.P., Carol,R.E, 2008, An Estimation of Supply in the Seafood Industry, Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 8:3, 1-15 Kwong,W.C., 2002, A time-series analysis of the price of Epinephelus, Aquaculture Economics Management, 6:3-4, 215-229 Linda, C., Barry, K; 2008, Technical Barriers to Trade: A Case Study of Phytosanitary Barriers and U.S.-Japanese Apple Trade. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp.351-366 Sengupta.R, 2003, USVietnam Trade War over Seafood: Free-Trade Not So Free After All, International Development Economics Associates, Available from URL: https://www. networkideas.org/news/sep2003/ news04_Seafood.html Thinh,N.P., 2012, The Vietnam pangasius industry report, HBS research D.C. Varian,H.K, 2006, Intermediate Micro Economics, Chapter 1: The market. ISBN: 0-393- 93702-4. Pp.1-19. Vasep report, 2011. Available from URL: https://vneconomy.vn /20120202095710P0C19/ xuat-khau-ca-tra-co-the-dat-2-ty-usd-trong-nam-2012.html Walter,I, 2011, Nontariff Barriers and the Export Performance of Developing Economies, The American Economic Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty Third Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, pp. 195-205 Walton, 2004, Seafood war: Vietnams fight for free trade in the US court of international trade, Pacific Rim Law Policy Journal Association, Vol. 13 No. 2